The Safe Non-Hand-to-Mouth (Under Review): NEW VERSION SOON
Revised Version (Under Review)
Previously circulating as ECB WP 2866 (Old version) titled "The Effects of Labor Income Risk Heterogeneity on the Marginal Propensity to Consume"
Standard consumption theory predicts that marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) decline with cash-on-hand. Introducing heterogeneity in the curvature of the consumption function and its covariance with income, I show that this pattern reflects only local heterogeneity: it holds within, but not necessarily across households whose consumption functions differ in concavity due to preferences or income risk. I first decompose the MPC into curvature and cash effects and show that when greater concavity (stronger desire or necessity to save) is associated with lower income levels (weaker ability to save), the curvature effect can dominate, reversing the standard cross-sectional MPC–cash monotonicity. I then derive a novel coefficient of intertemporal insurance (I ): lower I implies higher MPCs independently of cash-on-hand, because weaker precautionary motives permit stronger consumption front-loading, making households more responsive to transitory shocks. Numerical and Empirical applications to income-risk heterogeneity show that high-cash, low-risk households can exhibit higher MPCs out of transitory shocks, generating new implications for the role of household heterogeneity in aggregate dynamics.
Labor Income Risk and Monetary Policy: The Within-Wealth MPC Channel
Note: A new version with Edouard Challe (PSE) is coming soon
This paper studies how monetary policy affects individual consumption in a Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian (HANK) model with ex-ante heterogeneity in the income processes. In this model, lower-earning households face higher and more countercyclical income risk. This unequal incidence lowers their Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) relative to safer and higher-earning households at the same positive wealth level. In this environment, the effects of a monetary tightening operate along and within the wealth distribution, revealing that income risk heterogeneity amplifies the equilibrium response of aggregate consumption and generates a more persistent output contraction. Unlike standard HANKs, this amplification is driven by the larger elasticities of unconstrained households with higher earnings and lower risk, whose consumption share accounts for the bulk of aggregate consumption.
We study the role of heterogeneity in the revenues of individual firms for euro area macroeconomic dynamics. To this end, we specify two models: a standard aggregate vector autoregressive model (VAR) and an ``heterogeneous VAR'' (HVAR). The VAR model includes only aggregate data, while the HVAR model also incorporates the feedback loop between firms' revenue distribution and aggregate variables. Our results demonstrate that the behavior of firms' revenue distribution plays a significant role in explaining the dynamics of key euro area macroeconomic variables.
"Intertemporal MPC and Shock Size" with Tullio Jappelli and Alessandro Sciacchetano
Latest Version - December 2024 | CSEF Working Paper, 734 - October 2024 | Riksbank Working Paper, 443 - October 2024
We elicit the intertemporal Marginal Propensity to Consume (iMPC) based on hypothetical different-size lottery winnings through questions in the 2023-24 Italian Survey of Consumer Expectations (ISCE). Survey respondents were asked to allocate three hypothetical lottery winning amounts (€1,000, €10,000. and €50,000) between consumption and saving in both the year following the survey and over the longer term. The iMPC for a €1,000 win declines from 26% in the first year to about 1% five years after the shock. Larger win amounts have a smaller impact in the first year and a larger impact in the long run. The iMPC for a €10,000 (€50,000) prize declines from 19% (15%) in the first year to 2.5% (4%) in year five. Regardless of the size of the shock, the iMPC shows a weak negative relation to the cash-on-hand amount and a negative relation to income risk. We show that calibrated simulations of incomplete market models with borrowing constraints, income risk, and household heterogeneity are broadly consistent with these empirical findings.